(10352 Ergebnisse)

(192 Ergebnisse)

(1130 Ergebnisse) Comparing: Tiger II vs. M26 Pershing The most heavily armored tank carrying the most powerful anti-tank gun. (428 Ergebnisse) This new U.S. gun had successfully penetrated 8.5 inches of armor at 1,000 yards at 30 degrees.

(1452 Ergebnisse) (515 Ergebnisse)

(170 Ergebnisse) (157 Ergebnisse)

(434 Ergebnisse) (3079 Ergebnisse) It was the US Army’s final heavy tank design that was approved in early 1944 and went into production that September where 224 +/- were made.

(318 Ergebnisse) (185 Ergebnisse)

Durch die Nutzung unserer Dienste erklären Sie sich damit einverstanden!Schreiben Sie jetzt Ihre persönliche Erfahrung mit diesem Artikel und helfen Sie anderen bei deren Kaufentscheidung (361 Ergebnisse)

(112 Ergebnisse) (60 Ergebnisse) IS 2 (4) 31% . (665 Ergebnisse)

(368 Ergebnisse) The Pershing should really be compared more to the Panther or IS-2, tanks in the same weight class. (267 Ergebnisse) The Tiger II was a waste of effort. Likes Received 54 Points 190 Posts 135 Alliance United Attack Force Alliance Tag [U.A.F] 1; IS 2 vs Tiger II vs M26 Pershing. (4429 Ergebnisse) Many depends on tactical situation,the Pershing was built lower,the turret traverse as faster,both of them fired very accurately.The Pershing was maybe faster but the KT was able to turn in place. The vehicle's drawbacks included an overloaded suspension and engine-transmission group, as well as excessive general mass. The impetus for the development of the Tiger as well as the Pershing, their design phase and initiation into combat is all covered. (522 Ergebnisse) The most heavily armored tank carrying the most powerful anti-tank gun. (940 Ergebnisse)

(2605 Ergebnisse)

During the final battles on World War II's Western Front, the legendary German Tiger I heavy tank clashed with the brand-new M26 Pershing fielded by the United States. (315 Ergebnisse) (452 Ergebnisse)

(417 Ergebnisse) (381 Ergebnisse) (380 Ergebnisse)